Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 677 F.2d 560 - Tidwell v. Schweiker

Tidwell v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

677 F.2d 560 · 1982

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
8
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. (1983), Conner v. Reinhard (1988)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

3201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · O'Shea v. Littleton · Sosna v. Iowa · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The right of any person to any future payment under this subchapter shall not be transferable or assignable, at law or in equity, and none of the moneys paid or payable or rights existing under this subchapter shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process, or to the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it cannot be said that [the form] is voluntary or that the patient retains enough control to remove the agreement from the ambit of section 407,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.