Dietz v. Solem’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.2d 672 · 1982
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 1986
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Morissette v. United States · Sandstrom v. Montana · Mullaney v. Wilbur
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every trial presents a myriad of possible claims, pounsel might have overlooked or chosen to omit respondents’ due process argument while pursuing other avenues of defense. We have long recognized, however, that the Constitution guarantees criminal defendants only a fair trial and a competent attorney. It does not insure that defense counsel will recognize and raise every conceivable constitutional claim. Where the basis of a constitutional claim is available, and other defense counsel have perceived and litigated that claim, the demands of comity and finality counsel against labeling alleged unawareness of the objection as cause for a procedural default.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woodard v. Sargent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.