Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 677 F.2d 826 - Smith v. Schweiker

Smith v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

677 F.2d 826 · 1982

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Edwards v. Sullivan (1991), Poulin v. Bowen (1987)

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Cowart v. Schweiker · Clark v. Schweiker · Ware v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e are concerned not so much with whether every question was asked which might have been asked had [Edwards] been represented by an attorney, as we are with whether the record reveals evidentiary gaps which result in unfairness or 'clear prejudice.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]here the disability benefits claimant is unassisted by counsel, the ALJ has a duty scrupulously and conscientiously [to] probe into, inquire of, and explore for all the relevant facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The special duty assigned to the ALJ 'requires, essentially, a record which shows that the claimant was not prejudiced by lack of counsel.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.