Neely v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.3d 346 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · United States v. Salerno · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Morissette v. United States · Kolender v. Lawson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statute's very existence may cause others not before the court to refrain from constitutionally protected speech or expression.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Worsham v. State“[o]ffers to engage in illegal transactions enjoy no First Amendment protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Worsham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.