Kapche v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.3d 454 · 2012
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 705 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 8410
Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Bragdon v. Abbott · McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. · Nemaizer v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly unreasonable, arbitrary, or fanciful.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is well-settled that [a] party's failure to plead an affirmative defense...generally results in the waiver of that defense and its exclusion from the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the conduct at issue preceded the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, the pre-amendment standards to determine liability govern here.” (citing Lytes)). 5 . A”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.