Liu v. Amerco’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.3d 489 · 2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 373 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Brunswick Corporation v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat Inc · Atlantic Richfield Company v. Usa Petroleum Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The place to test factual assertions for deficiencies and against conflicting evidence is at summary judgment or trial ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is not clear to a legal certainty that the amount in controversy is less than $5 million. So we proceed to the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.