United States v. Backlund’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.3d 930 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 478 · 16 U.S.C. § 551 (Wildfire Disaster Recovery Act of 1989) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 30 U.S.C. § 26 · 30 U.S.C. § 612 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 703 · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Grayned v. City of Rockford · United States v. Mendoza-Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All uses of National Forest System lands, improvements, and resources, except those authorized by the regulations governing sharing use of roads (§ 212.9); grazing and livestock use (part 222); the sale and disposal of timber and special forest products, such as greens, mushrooms, and medicinal plants (part 223); and minerals (part 228) are designated "special uses.” Before conducting a special use, individuals or entities must submit a proposal to the authorized officer and must obtain a special use authorization from the authorized officer, unless that requirement is waived by paragraphs (c) through (e)(3) of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the District Ranger determines that any operation is causing or will likely cause significant disturbance of surface resources, the District Ranger shall notify the operator that the operator must submit a proposed plan of operations for approval and that the operations can not be conducted until a plan of operations is approved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“appealable decisions” do not explicitly cover the notice that Everist received. See 36 C.F.R. § 251.82 . However, by their terms, the rules apply broadly to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.