Rosa v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2017
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Hankerson v. Harris · Jennings v. Secretary of Department of Health · 534 F. Supp. 150 - Arroyo v. Schweiker · 573 F. Supp. 327 - Thomas v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was shameful in its atmosphere of alternating indifference, personal musings, impatience and condescension.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ventura v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.