Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 677 NE2D 586 - Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2012

7 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Key v. State · Dennis v. State · Fox v. State · Jewell v. State · Chupp v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[iJn ruling on whether the evidence would produce a different result, the trial court may properly consider the weight that a reasonable trier of fact would give it and while so doing may also evaluate its probable impact on a new trial in light of all the facts and circumstances shown at the original trial of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “destroy[ ] or obliterate[ ] the testimony upon which [the] conviction was obtained.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.