Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 677 SO2D 309 - Roberts v. State

Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 458 So. 2d 269 - Florida Bar v. Johnson · 446 So. 2d 97 - Mora v. City of Fort Lauderdale · 432 So. 2d 704 - Brown v. Brown · 418 So. 2d 1177 - McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. v. McCauley · 664 So. 2d 1004 - Ross v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The sentencing court shall impose or suspend sentence for each separate count, as convicted. The total sentence shall be within the guidelines sentence unless a departure is ordered. . If a split sentence is imposed, the incar-cerative portion of the sentence must not deviate more than 25 percent fivm the recommended guidelines prison sentence. The total sanction (incarceration and community control or probation) shall not exceed the term provided by general law or the guidelines recommended sentence where the provisions of subsection 921.001(5) apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “IF THE TRIAL COURT IMPOSES A SPLIT SENTENCE, MAY THE INCAR-CERATIVE PORTION. OF THE SENTENCE DEVIATE MORE THAN 25 PERCENT FROM THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES PRISON SENTENCE IF THE TRIAL COURT ■OTHERWISE COMPLIES WITH THE APPLICABLE STATUTES AND RULES IN IMPOSING THE DEPARTURE SENTENCE?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.