Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

677 So. 2d 393

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-07-24

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2006

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-07-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Jeffrey Smith appeals from his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1,000 feet of a person. We hold that the state presented sufficient evidence to support his convictions, and we affirm his judgment. However, we must reverse Smith’s sentence and remand for re-sentencing based on a scoresheet error.

¶2Smith was sentenced on a single score-sheet for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1,000 feet of a person, and carrying a concealed firearm, a charge which arose from another case. The scoresheet includes an additional twenty-five points for possession of a semiautomatic weapon. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.702(d)(12). The state concedes that it presented no proof that the firearm Smith used was a semiautomatic weapon. Thus, on remand, the trial court shall resentence Smith based on a corrected scoresheet which reflects an additional eighteen points for the possession of a firearm pursuant to rule 3.702(d)(12).

¶3Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
/677/so2d/393 · .json · Public domain