677 So. 2d 603 - State v. Hingle’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · Washington v. Texas · Kliewer v. New Jersey · United States v. Eichman · 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Specific intent is a state of mind and need not be proved as a fact, but may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction and the actions of the defendant. Specific intent exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the giving or offering to give, directly or indirectly, anything of apparent present or prospective value to any [public official], with the intent to influence his conduct in relation to his position, employment, or duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.