Hunt v. Stratton’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
22 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 424
Relies on Hyatt v. Larson Dairy, Inc. · Hunter v. South Florida Sod · 527 So. 2d 873 - Trilla v. Braman Cadillac · Irwin Yacht & Marine Corp. v. Piernik · Dax & Trim Development Co. v. Mullens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We note that both the federal and state disability benefit schemes include incremental increases in benefits to account for future increases in the cost of living (federal cost-of-living adjustments and state supplemental benefits). While the existing workers' compensation supplemental benefit is considered in the initial calculation of the workers' compensation offset, the law does not contemplate a recalculation of the offset based upon any increases thereafter.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“compensation benefits payable under this chapter”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.