Pine v. Doolittle’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 418 So. 2d 575 - Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co. · 609 So. 2d 195 - Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co. · 513 So. 2d 1126 - Roger v. Estate of Moulton · 585 So. 2d 534 - Henson v. Safeco Ins. Companies · 642 So. 2d 208 - Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In other words, the form used by the insurance company must give the applicant the opportunity to make a "meaningful selection" from his options. (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall afford Uninsured Motorist Coverage unless the insured ... reject[s] such coverage”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.