Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 677 SO2D 929 - Cunningham v. State

Cunningham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Thompson v. Louisiana · 274 So. 2d 256 - Nelson v. State · Hardwick v. State · 497 So. 2d 863 - Johnston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because his lawyer, advising him to accept a plea bargain, told him that it was `like you playing Russian Roulette with your life if you take it to trial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the factually-based claim of coercion [which was presented] in Roberts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.