Randolph v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2010
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 620 So. 2d 1244 - Casa Clara Condo. Ass'n v. Charley Toppino and Sons, Inc. · 670 So. 2d 932 - DEPT. OF BANKING & FIN. v. Osborne Stern · 428 So. 2d 222 - Lewis v. Guthartz · 271 Ill. App. 3d 750 - Kanter v. Deitelbaum · 663 So. 2d 1327 - Woodson v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n insurance broker, admittedly having a fiduciary duty to an insured, is in no different position than an attorney or an accountant in relationship to plaintiffs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moss v. Appel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.