Hardin v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis
678 F.2d 589 · 1982
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (1996), Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth (1988)
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · Thomas v. United States · Nettles v. Wainwright · Washington v. Watkins · Fitzgerald v. Estelle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accordingly, we hold that the failure of a party to file written objections to proposed findings and recommendations in a magistrate’s report, filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. [§] 636(b)(1), shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the district judge of an issue covered in the report and shall bar the party from attacking on appeal factual findings accepted or adopted by the district court except upon grounds of plain .error or manifest injustice. Provided, however, we also hold that no limitation of the right to appeal ... and no limitation of the scope of appeal ... shall result un less the magistrate informs the parties that objections must be filed within ten days after service of a copy of the magistrate’s report is made upon them.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he failure to object no longer waives the right to appeal but simply limits the scope of appellate review of factual findings to plain error review; no limitation of the review of legal conclusions results.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.