Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 678 F.2d 604 - Jesse Ramirez v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., and Mark White, Attorney General of Texas

Jesse Ramirez v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., and Mark White, Attorney General of Texas’s Empirical Analysis

678 F.2d 604 · 1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 1987
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Wainwright v. Sykes · Lewis v. United States · Holman Freeman v. State of Georgia · Hernandez v. Estelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant's belief that a particular witness' testimony is crucial to his case should be brought out at the state trial, giving the state trial court the opportunity to determine the importance of the missing witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.