Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 678 F.2d 742 - Valley Liquors, Inc. v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.

Valley Liquors, Inc. v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

678 F.2d 742 · 1982

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Roland Machinery Company v. Dresser Industries Inc (1984), Valley Liquors, Inc. v. Renfield Importers, Ltd. (1987)

29 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

5201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Continental Inc v. Gte Sylvania Incorporated · Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. · Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc. · Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp. · Cernuto, Incorporated v. United Cabinet Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] firm that has no market power is unlikely to adopt practices that disserve its consumers; it cannot afford to.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a certain unreality in the careful parsing of motives that Cernuto seems to require”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “too tenuous to require the trier of fact to draw the inference [of a conspiracy] that Valley asked him to draw” and that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.