Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 678 F.2d 883 - Smith v. Atkins

Smith v. Atkins’s Empirical Analysis

678 F.2d 883 · 1982

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
February 2007
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2007 · most notably Osborn v. Shillinger (1988), Tapia v. Tansy (1991)

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

150198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Rose v. Lundy · Brown v. Allen · Sanders v. United States · Sumner v. Mata

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “avoid dismissal of his petition by amending the petition to delete the unexhausted claims. However, if the petitioner elects to amend his petition, he risks forfeiting any future consideration of the unexhausted issues under the successive petition doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[the issue] challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, involves solely a question of law which was addressed by the state court on direct appeal and [thus has been exhausted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[t]he relevant inquiry ... is whether the factual issue was presented to the state courts in a posture allowing full and fair consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.