United States v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis
678 F.2d 886 · 1982
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably United States v. Cross (1991), United States v. Romm (2006)
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · Draper v. United States · Harris v. McRae · Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ccepting a good and having either physical control of or apparent legal power over a good is sufficient to show that an individual received it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]robable cause may be based on facts within the magistrate's knowledge and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kaiser v. Lief“the test is the reasonableness of the description. Elaborate specificity is unnecessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.