Rodgers v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
678 F.3d 1149 · 2012
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Faretta v. California · United States v. Wade · Penson v. Ohio · Teague v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when the trial court denied his timely request for representation for a new trial motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.