Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 678 F.3d 702 - Robles-Urrea v. Holder

Robles-Urrea v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

678 F.3d 702 · 2012

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Taylor v. United States · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Branzburg v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not all serious crimes meet this standard, however. Indeed, we have determined, for example, that burglary, Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 1013 , 1020 (9th Cir.2005), and assault with a deadly weapon, Carr v. INS, 86 F.3d 949 , 951 (9th Cir.1996), do not involve moral turpitude. To be considered a crime of moral turpitude, a crime other than fraud must be more than serious; it must offend the most fundamental moral values of society, or as some would say, ‘shock[ ] the public con science.’ Medina v. United States, 259 F.3d 220 , 227 (4th Cir.2001) (quoting Matter of Danesh, 19 I. & N. Dec. 669 , 670 (BIA 1988)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “requires not a specific intent to conceal or obstruct justice, but only knowledge of the felony.” Id. at 710 . That court, however, also recognized that knowledge alone is insufficient, as misprision requires”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “inherently base, vile, or depraved, and contrary to the accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between persons or to society in general.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.