Padilla v. Yoo’s Empirical Analysis
678 F.3d 748 · 2012
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 2340A · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton · Pearson v. Callahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The Court] accept[s] as true all well-pleaded allegations of material fact, and construe[s] them in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[The Court] review[s] de novo a district court's denial of a motion to dismiss on the basis of qualified immunity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.