Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

678 N.E.2d 381

In re Raikos

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1997

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1997-03-12

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-03-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Lee v. State (2004), Tom-Wat, Inc. v. Fink (2001)

4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

1501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

¶2The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission has submitted to this Court its findings and recommendation on Petitioner John D. Raikos’ Petition for Reinstatement to the Bar of this State, therein finding that the respondent has met all of the reinstatement criteria contained in Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4(b) and, accordingly, recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

¶3And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that it should approve the recommendation of the Commission and grant the Petitioner’s Petition for Reinstatement.

¶4IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Petitioner in this proceeding, John D. Raikos, is hereby reinstated as an attorney at the Bar of this Court.

¶5The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, to the Petitioner, to the State Board of Law Examiners, and to all parties who were previously notified of the Petitioner’s resignation in this cause.

/s/ Randall T. ShepardRandall T. ShepardChief Justice of IndianaAll Justices concur.
/678/ne2d/381 · .json · Public domain