State v. Shabata’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2020
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Agurs · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary · People v. Dail · State v. Petree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[iJnformation known to police officers working on a case is charged to the prosecution since the officers are part of the prosecution team.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“At the outset, we stress that we are concerned with more than the prosecutor’s state of knowledge_ Information known to police officers working on the case is charged to the prosecution since the officers are part of the prosecution team. Neither the prosecutor nor officers working on a case may withhold exculpatory evidence or evidence valuable to a defendant. ... [T]he good or bad faith of the prosecutor is irrelevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Knight“[a]gainst the ample evidence of guilt in this case, ... [n]one of [defendant's] arguments identifies a reasonable hypothesis alternative to defendant's guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Layman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.