Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 678 SO2D 1046 - Ex Parte Richardson

Ex Parte Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2015

7 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ackerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This case is strikingly similar to Ex parte Johnson, 669 So.2d 205 (Ala.1995). In that case, ... I joined Justice Houston’s dissent, which stated that ‘an assistant district attorney cannot, by inadvertence, undermine the legislature’s authority to establish sentencing ranges.’ 669 So.2d at 207 . As in Johnson, the majority in this case overlooks the mandatory aspect of the sentence enhancement statutes as established by the legislature.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.