678 So. 2d 1216 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Freeman v. Hall · 54 Ala. App. 491 - Bowens v. State · Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General · Consalvo v. State · 440 So. 2d 1130 - Nelson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We might have found [the juror’s] silence harmless and that the appellant suffered no prejudice ... were it not for the silence of [the staff member]. ... [W]e find the appearance of probable prejudice existed where both a member of the district attorney’s staff, who was seated at the prosecution’s table and who participated in jury selection, and a juror failed to disclose information inquired about during voir dire relevant to the defense in exercising its peremptory strikes.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.