678 So. 2d 1278 - The Florida Bar v. Cramer’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holywell Corp. v. Bank of New York · Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Gizoni · 620 So. 2d 1252 - The Florida Bar v. Rood · 575 So. 2d 176 - The Florida Bar v. McClure · 651 So. 2d 1182 - The Florida Bar v. Garland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Cramer perpetrated a fraud upon a financial institution. We have in the past recognized that a felony conviction for similar misconduct warranted disbarment. See Florida Bar v. Forbes, 596 So.2d 1051 (Fla.1992). Although Cram-er had not been criminally convicted for his actions at the time of this grievance proceeding, we conclude that his total conduct in this incident coupled with his prior disciplinary record evince a pat tern of misconduct warranting disbarment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.