Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 678 SO2D 247 - Cobb v. State

Cobb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Musser v. States · Ex Parte Branch · United States v. Young-Bey · Ex Parte Thomas · 548 So. 2d 501 - Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"consider `all relevant circumstances' that could show discrimination or the lack of discriminatory intent. Branch . The fact that the jury is composed of a high percentage of the group that is alleged to have been excluded is only one factor that the court should consider when determining whether a prima facie case of discrimination has been established. Thomas . If the court finds that the appellant established a prima facie case of discrimination, then the court should require the state to give reasons for striking the blacks from the venire and proceed as directed by Branch . If the court decides that the appellant has failed to establish a prima facie case, it shall set forth, in its written finding of facts and conclusions of law, the specific reasons for that determination. On remand, the trial court is entitled to grant the appellant any relief to which he may be entitled."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.