Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 678 SO2D 410 - State v. Pinder

State v. Pinder’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
6
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2025

20 state decisions

901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · United States v. Nixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant must first establish a reasonable probability that the privileged matters contain material information necessary to his defense.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'intrudes on the rights of the victim and dilutes the statutory privilege,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether rooted directly in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or in the Compulsory Process or Confrontation clauses of the Sixth Amendment, the Constitution guarantees criminal defendants `a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.