Wareham v. State

Francis X. WAREHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 2, 1996.

Rehearing Denied August 30, 1996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-08-02

Decided 1996-08-02

¶1Francis X. Wareham, Polk City, pro se.

¶2No Appearance for Appellee.

¶3 *433 GRIFFIN, Judge.

¶4In these two cases, which we consolidate and consider together, defendant appeals the summary denial of his third and his fourth^[1] Rule 3.800(a) motions to correct sentences he received for burglary, after violation of probation, and for manslaughter.

¶5The trial court correctly ruled that these motions are frivolous and constitute an abuse of the court's process. There is no need to indulge such filings until their number approaches a dozen. Accordingly, we order that appellant shall not be permitted to file any further pro se attacks upon his 1989 judgment and sentences.

¶6AFFIRMED with directions.

¶7GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

¶8[1] It is denominated a "supplement."