Machetti v. Linahan’s Empirical Analysis
679 F.2d 236 · 1982
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Westbrook v. Zant (1983), Smith v. Kemp (1983)
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri · Castaneda v. Partida · Alexander v. Louisiana · Hernandez v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“distinctive” group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (3) that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the juiy-selection process. Once a prima facie violation has been made, the state’s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cerrone v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.