Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 F.2d 614 - Searcy v. E. T. Slider, Inc.

Searcy v. E. T. Slider, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

679 F.2d 614 · 1982

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
April 1992
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Hudson · Offshore Company and the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Appellants v. Johnie M. Robison, Appellee-Appellant. Robison v. Offshore Company and the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York · Gordon v. United States · Senko v. La Crosse Dredging Corporation · Morgan v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) is the vessel in navigation, (2) does the employee have a more or less permanent connection with the vessel, and (3) was the employee on board the vessel primarily in aid of navigation?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.