Haynes Miller’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably In Re Lennon (1986), In Re Riding (1984)
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · United Steelworkers of America v. Weber · Board of Education v. Mapp · United States v. Tyler · Costello v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“From 1971 to 1981, Haynes received retainer pay for serving in the Fleet Reserve. As a member of the Fleet Reserve, Haynes was required to perform up to two months of active duty training every four years ... [and] was also required to report to the Navy for a physical examination at least once every four years.... Moreover, Haynes was subject to recall to active duty in time of war or during a national emergency... .He also remained subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.... In 1981 after Haynes became a retired member of the Regular Navy, he remained subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice ... and could be recalled to active duty in time of war or national emergency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Hewitt“Under most pension plans, the retiree is not required to perform any services for his former employer. The military retiree, however, remains obligated to the federal government to perform certain duties. If the retiree, fails to perform these duties, his retirement benefits may be terminated.... In light of the obligations imposed on a military retiree as conditions of receipt of retirement pay, military retirement is actually reduced compensation for reduced current services. Haynes’ retirement pay is proceeds for services performed after the filing of the bankruptcy petition, and, thus, it is not property of the estate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Hewitt“In light of the obligations imposed on a military retiree as conditions of receipt of retirement pay, military retirement pay is actually reduced compensation for reduced current services (citations omitted). Haynes’s [sic] retirement pay is proceeds for services performed after the filing of the bankruptcy petition, and, thus, it is not property of the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 541 (a)(6).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Hammond
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.