Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 F.2d 736 - Madison v. United States

Madison v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

679 F.2d 736 · 1982

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2003 · most notably Summers v. United States (1990), Aslakson v. United States (1986)

27 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

390198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680

Relies on Dalehite v. United States · Indian Towing Company v. United States · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Houchins v. KQED, Inc. · United States v. United States Gypsum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The planning level consists of decisions involving questions of policy, that is, the evaluation of the financial, political, economic and social effects of a plan. On the other hand, the operational level involves decisions relating to the normal day-to-day operations of government.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) Any claim * * * based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be abused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.