Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 F.2d 751 - Hallberg v. Brasher

Hallberg v. Brasher’s Empirical Analysis

679 F.2d 751 · 1982

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc. (1984), Keenan v. Computer Associates International, Inc. (1994)

28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co. · Kiernan v. Van Schaik · Alloy International Co. v. Hoover-NSK Bearing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] litigant is entitled to have the jury charged concerning his theory of the case if there is any direct or circumstantial evidence to support it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in determining whether the evidence is sufficient to support the giving of a particular instruction, the evidence should be considered in the light most favorable to the party offering the instruction, giving it `the benefit of all favorable inferences reasonably deducible therefrom.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the reasonable value of the services, consortium, companionship, comfort, instruction, guidance, counsel, training, and support”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.