Copper & Brass Fabricators Council, Inc. v. Department of the Treasury’s Empirical Analysis
679 F.2d 951 · 1982
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donovan (1983), Chiles v. Thornburgh (1989)
39 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294
Relies on Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc. · Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc v. B Camp Barlow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requires some indicia--however slight--that the litigant before the court was intended to be protected, benefited or regulated by the statute under which suit is brought.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“arguably within the zone of interests to be protected or regulated by the statute ... in question.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'arguably within the zone of interests to be protected' " by the Commerce Clause) (quoting Data Processing, 397 U.S. at 153, 90 S.Ct. at 829). In other cases, "[w]ithout mentioning the 'zone' test, the Court has rejected objections that certain plaintiffs lacked standing, although application of the test arguably would have yielded a different result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.