Wright v. Corning’s Empirical Analysis
679 F.3d 101 · 2012
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 342 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co. · 166 Ill. 2d 72 - Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ummary judgment is appropriate when 'the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a claim arises when an individual is exposed pre-confirmation to a product or other conduct giving rise to an injury that underlies a 'right to payment' under the [Bankruptcy] Code.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.