Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 F.3d 1052 - Bobadilla v. Holder

Bobadilla v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

679 F.3d 1052 · 2012

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
February 2022
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Padilla v. Kentucky · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Moral turpitude refers generally to conduct which is inherently base, vile, or depraved, and contrary to the accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between persons or to society in general. Moral turpitude has been defined as an act which is per se morally reprehensible and intrinsically wrong or malum in se.... Among the tests to determine if a crime involves moral turpitude is whether the act is accompanied by a vicious motive or corrupt mind.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “a reasonable interpretation of the statute” that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the alien’s record of conviction, including documents such as the indictment, the judgment of conviction, jury instructions, a signed guilty plea, or the plea transcript.” Silva-Trevino, 24 I. & N. Dec. at 699; see Bobadilla, 679 F.3d at 1056 . If the inquiry cannot be resolved at step 2, the immigration judge may proceed to step 3 to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.