Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 F.3d 355 - United States v. Cunningham

United States v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis

679 F.3d 355 · 2012

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 2461 (Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Pullman-Standard v. Swint

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) ... scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) ... testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) ... testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “To secure a conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant “knowingly and willfully joined in an agreement with at least one other person to commit an act of [wire] fraud and that there was at least one overt act in furtherance of the agreement.” United States v. Jamie-son, 427 F.3d 394 , 402 (6th Cir.2005) (internal quotation marks omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.