United States v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
679 F.3d 721 · 2012
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1010 · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 657
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · 131 S. Ct. 1762 - Bobby v. Mitts · United States v. Shaid · United States v. Platenburg · United States v. Walsh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.