Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 F.3d 905 - LaRoque v. Holder

LaRoque v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

679 F.3d 905 · 2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973C (§ 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Relies on Honig v. Doe · Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp. · Georgia v. United States · Clarke v. United States · Better Government Association v. Department of State National Wildlife Federation v. United States Department of Interior

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “nothing will hinder appellant Nix from running in a nonpartisan election during the next cycle.” Id. at 909. The Court rejected the appellants’ assertion that the possibility of future injury resulting from § 5 of the Voting Rights Act established a live controversy, in part because of the speculative nature of the claim, and also because there was no evidence that the Attorney General’s failure to preclear a future change in local voting practices would cause appellants any”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “obtained everything that they could recover from this lawsuit”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.