Priddy v. Edelman’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2003
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Aronson v. Lewis · California ex rel. State Lands Commission v. United States · Moore v. City of Paducah · Addington v. Farmer's Elevator Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he uncertainties which had been raised by the Edelman August 18th offer, and [Edelman's] unwillingness to offer further assurances,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Priddy v. Edelman“such person shall pay the increased consideration to each security holder whose securities are taken up....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“otherwise than pursuant to such tender offer ... until the expiration of the [tender offer] period....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.