Friedman v. Yula’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation · Langley v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“AJA Skies the Limit.” . Scottsdale is an Ohio corporation having its principal place of business in Scottsdale, Arizona. Notice of Removal ¶ 7. Kinsale is an Arkansas corporation having its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. 14 ¶ 8. . The second theory involves "claims about parent companies who have not signed agreements containing arbitration clauses entered into by related entities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.