¶1We have for review Salazar v. State, 665 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified conflict with State v.
¶2Lamoureux, 660 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash Salazarbased on Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996). Melbourneapplies to parts 1, 2, and 3 of section 316.193(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1993).
¶3It is so ordered.