679 So. 2d 1184
679 So.2d 1184
21 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 399
Decided September 26, 1996
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1996-09-26
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1999
1 state decisions
Relies on Melbourne v. State · 660 So. 2d 1063 - State v. Lamoureux · 665 So. 2d 1066 - Salazar v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-09-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We have for review State v. Lamoureux, 660 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), which expressly and directly conflicts with Salazar v. State, 665 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the result in Lamoureuxbased on Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996).
¶2It is so ordered.