Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

679 So. 2d 21

Curry v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-08-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2000

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-08-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We elect to treat appellee’s motion to relinquish jurisdiction as a confession of error. Appellee concedes that appellant’s motion to amend his petition for writ of mandamus should have been granted by the lower court. We therefore REVERSE the order dismissing the petition for writ of mandamus and REMAND for further proceedings following the filing of an amended petition and appel-lee’s filing of a responsive pleading thereto.

WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.
/679/so2d/21 · .json · Public domain