Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 So. 2d 22 - Knuth v. State

679 So. 2d 22 - Knuth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2010

5 state decisions

30199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Closing arguments are the last and best opportunity trial counsel have to directly address the jury on what they should or should not decide within the parameters of the proper instructions the jury is about to receive from the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the failure to give the instruction before the defendants had their final say generated prejudice that can only be remedied by retrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.