Ware v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on See v. City of Seattle · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · 659 So. 2d 269 - Forest Park Condominium Ass'n v. Widera · 483 So. 2d 433 - State v. Jones · 544 So. 2d 333 - In Re EBL
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he `body' or identity of a defendant or respondent in a criminal or civil proceeding is never itself suppressible as a fruit of an unlawful arrest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“WHERE THE IDENTITY OF A DRIVER IS AN ESSENTIAL ISSUE THAT MUST BE PROVEN, IS THAT IDENTITY SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION IF IT IS DISCOVERED AS A RESULT OF AN UNLAWFUL SEARCH AND SEIZURE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.